Results

Data & Findings

Primary erosion campaign, electron-backstreaming lifetime analysis, and Fowler–Nordheim breakdown risk assessment. All 36 runs fully reproducible from VIOT3/campaign_results.json.

Inside the work

The impact behind the numbers.

Concept in motion
DISCHARGE PLASMASCREEN / ACCEL GRIDSEXTRACTED ION BEAMSCREENACCELCEX ION → ACCEL-GRID WALLSPUTTERED ATOMS

A conceptual CEX-ion impact sequence at the accelerator grid. The measured simulation results appear in the charts below.

01

Track

Follow charge-exchange ions that can be accelerated back toward the downstream accelerator-grid face.

02

Count

Compare the atoms lost from the substrate and coating across campaign runs.

03

Interpret

Read erosion alongside lifetime and field-emission risk; each tells a different part of the story.

Comparative erosion — atoms sputtered per run

ThrottleI_b (A)Mo (atoms)GNP (atoms)Graphene (atoms)GNP LEFGraphene LEF
TH00.516.827e101.740e101.841e113.92×0.37×
TH50.841.124e122.657e111.988e124.23×0.57×
TH101.104.435e121.579e126.293e122.81×0.70×
TH151.763.730e132.679e134.404e131.39×0.85×

GNP LEF = Mo erosion / GNP erosion. Values >1 mean GNP reduces erosion. Values <1 for Graphene mean graphene worsens erosion. CV < 0.57% across all 12 cases.

Lifetime-extension factor vs. throttle — GNP reduces erosion, graphene worsens it

GNP LEFGraphene LEF
01.252.503.744.99GNP LEF — TH0: 3.92×3.92×Graphene LEF — TH0: 0.37×0.37×TH0GNP LEF — TH5: 4.23×4.23×Graphene LEF — TH5: 0.57×0.57×TH5GNP LEF — TH10: 2.81×2.81×Graphene LEF — TH10: 0.70×0.70×TH10GNP LEF — TH15: 1.39×1.39×Graphene LEF — TH15: 0.85×0.85×TH15

Electron-backstreaming lifetime factor (LEF_EBS)

Coatingφ_m (V)dφ_m/dr (V/m)dr/dt (m/s)dφ_m/dt (V/s)LEF_EBS
Mo (baseline)8.957.367e54.309e-83.148e-21.0×
GNP8.957.367e53.270e-92.389e-313.18×
Graphene8.857.367e56.382e-84.702e-20.669×

Internal cross-check: dφ_m/dr = 736,719.386 V/m identical to machine precision across all three coatings — validates that LEF_EBS differences come purely from erosion rates. 95% CI widths: ~0.5% of mean.

Fowler–Nordheim vacuum breakdown — Weibull parameters

Materialφ (eV)Weibull λWeibull kOnset (P>1e-4)P_BD @ 15 MV/m
Mo4.61002.07.27 MV/m0.15
Graphene4.51501.84.01 MV/m0.44
GNP4.52001.52.26 MV/m0.58

NSTAR nominal inter-grid field ≈ 1.9 MV/m. Rim field enhancement β ~2–10 for machined edges, ~70 for sharp nanostructures — can push local field into the 2.3–7.3 MV/m divergence band.

Vacuum-breakdown onset field by material — lower is riskier

02.144.296.438.58Onset field — Mo: 7.27 MV/m7.27 MV/mMoOnset field — Graphene: 4.01 MV/m4.01 MV/mGrapheneOnset field — GNP: 2.26 MV/m2.26 MV/mGNP

Summary

GNP wins on erosion. GNP is risky on breakdown.

GNP reduces erosion 1.39–4.23× and extends EBS-limited life up to 13.18×. Its edge-rich morphology drops breakdown onset from 7.3 to 2.3 MV/m — partially negating the benefit. Graphene is actively harmful at all throttles: it adds an erosion channel and shortens EBS life to 0.669×.